<%@LANGUAGE="JAVASCRIPT" CODEPAGE="1252"%> Obscenity guilty plea dismissed on appealFree speech focus in child-porn case  


Obscenity guilty plea dismissed on appeal
Free speech focus in child-porn case

Andrew Welsh-Huggins
Associated Press
Jul. 18, 2003 12:00 AM
COLUMBUS, Ohio - In a victory for free-speech advocates, an Appeals Court on Thursday threw out the guilty plea of a man imprisoned for writing fictitious stories in which he fantasized about molesting and torturing children.
Lawyers specializing in the First Amendment believe Brian Dalton was the first person in the United States successfully prosecuted for child pornography that involved writings, not images.
The stories, which prosecutors say were never acted on, were about three children, ages 10 and 11, being caged in a basement, molested and tortured.
Dalton, 24, of Columbus, pleaded guilty in July 2001 to pandering obscenity involving a minor. He later asked to withdraw the plea so he could fight the constitutionality of the law, but Franklin County Common Pleas Judge Nodine Miller refused. ACLU attorneys then appealed.
The 10th Ohio District Court of Appeals in Columbus sent Dalton's case back to the Franklin County court, ruling that Dalton received ineffective legal assistance at trial.
His attorneys had asked the court to dismiss the case on the grounds that prosecuting someone for their private thoughts and writings violates free-speech protections. Benson Wolman, an attorney representing Dalton, said Thursday's ruling gives Dalton a chance to make that case before a trial court judge.
Franklin County prosecutor Ron O'Brien said he hasn't decided whether to appeal to the Ohio Supreme Court or put Dalton on trial again.
Dalton was sentenced to seven years in prison, plus 4 1/2 years from a 1998 child pornography conviction because he violated probation by possessing the journal.
The Family Research Council, which fights child pornography, said it believes a case could still be made against Dalton "in the mere creation and possession of child pornography writing," spokeswoman Kristin Hansen said.
First Amendment advocates welcomed the decision.
"I was just startled by the original development of the case, the notion that what are essentially thoughts or one's tortured imagination could become the basis for prosecution," said Robert O'Neil, director of the Thomas Jefferson Center for the Protection of Free Expression.



 
Find this article at:
http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/news/articles/0718obscene18.html