The Tragedy of 9/11/01
Liberty and Security
"Those who would give up essential
liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor
safety."
Ben Franklin "Historical Review of 1759"
Due ________ ..................................
80 points possible according to the "Yes Test"
Directions: Answer the EQ in a paper which follows the position paper assignment
outline and YES Test.
EQ: What should be the first job of government, to protect Americans' safety or protect Americans' liberties?
Connections to make:
Fourth Amendment |
First Amendment |
Executive war power (comander in chief) |
Rule of law |
Equal Protection |
Civil liberties |
Legislative law making (Patriot Act) |
Privacy |
Second Amendment |
The Writ of Habeas Corpus (Art. I Sec. 9) |
Judicial review ( Supreme Court decisions) |
Historical Primary Scource |
Historical Primary Socurces (citation
of at least one required):
Listen to this first from NPR in Real Audio
Articles:
- Judge strikes down part of Patriot Act
A provision of the Patriot Act that requires people who are formally contacted by the FBI for information to keep it a secret is unconstitutional, a federal judge ruled on Thursday.
- Court Limits Lawsuits Over Government Surveillance
A federal appeals court has ruled that civil liberties groups have no standing to challenge President Bush's domestic eavesdropping program in court.
- Harassment of Muslims Rises
Complaints registered with national civil rights group jumped 30% in 2005 from previous year.
- Young U.S. Muslims Strive for Harmony
9/11 Spurred Action, Helped Define Beliefs
- Watching your every move
So the National Security Agency has been collecting details on the dialing habits of tens of millions of Americans. The spy agency says it was trying to keep us safe when it embarked on a secret mission to monitor our calling patterns after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
- Arizonans split on balancing privacy, security
- 'Ordinary Americans' Face New Scrutiny
Since its enactment in 2001, the USA Patriot Act has spurred the FBI to probe tens of thousands of U.S. residents not alleged to be terrorists or spies.
- Patriot Act proposal alters death penalty
- 2 border governors take aim at security
Napolitano, Sonoran chief announce anti-crime moves
- NYC Officials Reveal New Glimpse of 9/11
- In thousands of pages of oral histories released Friday, firefighters describe in vivid, intimate detail how they rushed to save fleeing civilians from churning smoke and fire before the World Trade Center collapsed in a monstrous cloud of debris and choking dust.
- Public Debates Line Between Public Safety and Civil Liberties
- Liberal-conservative alliance seeks change in USA Patriot Act
An unusual coalition of conservative groups and the liberal American Civil Liberties Union opened a public campaign Tuesday to scale back the enhanced surveillance powers granted to law enforcement after the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks. 03.23.2005
- Homeland Security warning unconstitutional
- Gonzales open to Patriot Act revisions- But says none should weaken the anti-terrorism tool
- FBI kept tabs on ACLU, others
The FBI has thousands of pages of records in its files relating to the monitoring of civil rights, environmental and similar advocacy groups, the Justice Department acknowledges. 7.18.2005
- GOP balks at retaining sections of Patriot Act
Jul. 14, 2005 12:00 AM
- First Amendment Gains Support as Post-9/11 Fears Ease
USA TODAY -Mark Memmott-June 28, 2005
- House Votes To Curb Patriot Act
FBI's Power to Seize Library Records Would Be Halted
- 44%
in survey would curb U.S. Muslims' civil liberties
- House votes to extend Patriot Act - Democrats voice civil liberties concerns
- Secrecy provision frightens critics
Civil liberties groups and advocates of open government are alarmed at a provision moving rapidly in Congress that would give a new national intelligence director power to keep information secret to protect intelligence "sources and methods." 10.23.2004
- YAHOO
Search on the USA Patriot Act
- Judge Rules Against Patriot Act Provision
- George F. Will: High court must
curb tyranny by government
The U.S. Constitution, properly construed by a vigilant Supreme
Court, prevents untrammeled power, which is the definition of despotism.
- National ID card recommended
WASHINGTON - Sept. 11 commissioners told Congress on Monday
they want the federal government to set standards for getting driver's
licenses to make it harder for terrorists to fake their identities.
- 2003 Patriot Act used
vs. common crime
In the two years since law enforcement agencies gained fresh powers to help
them track down and punish terrorists, police and prosecutors have increasingly
turned the force of the new laws not on al-Qaida cells but on people charged
with common crimes.
- Suit challenges constitutionality
of anti-terror law
The American Civil Liberties Union and six
Muslim groups Wednesday brought the first constitutional challenge to the
sweeping anti-terrorism legislation passed after the Sept. 11 attacks, arguing
that the law gives federal agents virtually unchecked authority to spy on
Americans.
-
- Police getting more leeway to watch political
groups
Even as civil libertarians challenge police surveillance
of citizens, including anti-war organizers, judges and lawmakers across the
nation are easing long-standing restraints on police in the name of homeland
security.
- Civil liberties groups lose on surveillance
An effort by a coalition of civil liberties groups to bring a Supreme Court
challenge to the government's use of expanded surveillance authority under
a post-Sept. 11 statute failed Monday.
- Supreme Court urged to restrict
spying powers Civil liberties
groups are using a long shot approach in an effort to get the Supreme Court
to limit the government's power to spy, filing an appeal Tuesday on behalf
of people who don't even know they're being monitored.
- Critics Decry Detention of M. Eastern Men
A post-Sept. 11 federal registration policy that led to the detention of hundreds
of Middle Eastern immigrants hurts more than it helps the war on terrorism,
critics charged.
- Among other potential or actual erosions
of liberty (due to 9/11) denounced by civil rights groups have been:
- Balance civil liberties, U.S.
security
The Bush administration asserts full executive powers to ward off terrorism
at home while it diminishes the reach of federal regulatory agencies whose
job it is to protect the public against dangers or abuses.
- What'll happen to our freedom?
- Act lets FBI
examine our reading habits
DALLAS - To many, it's the bedrock for all other American
liberties: our right to read what we please without the government peering
over our shoulders. Many also believe that Congress put this right in jeopardy
six weeks after Sept. 11 when it passed the USA PATRIOT Act with almost no
discussion or debate.
http://www.azstarnet.com/star/today/20824NATTACKS-BOOKSNOOPS.html
- Expanded anti-terror powers rejected
WASHINGTON - The secretive federal court that approves spying
on terrorism suspects has refused to give the Justice Department broad new
powers in the war on terror, saying the government had misused the law and
misled the court dozens of times, according to an extraordinary legal ruling
released Thursday. http://www.arizonarepublic.com/news/articles/0823secretcourt23.html
- Poll:
U.S. Security More Important-
Four in five Americans would give up some freedoms to gain security
and four in 10 worry terrorists will harm them or their family, a new Gallup
poll shows. JUNE 11,2002 08:11 ET http://wire.ap.org/?FRONTID=NATIONAL&SLUG=TERRORISM%2dPOLL
- FindLaw's
Sanford Levinson on the U.S. Constitution in wartime
Does law speak in time of war? And, if so, to whom, and how loudly?
No question is more important to a polity that claims to be structured by
constitutional norms
http://www.cnn.com/2001/LAW/10/columns/fl.levinson.wartime.10.21/index.html
- Graphic showing the results of
a poll which asks -- how the public feels about increasing government scrutiny
- Senate sends
anti-terror surveillance bill to president
The Senate passed sweeping anti-terrorism legislation
Thursday. The measure it sent President Bush would expand the governments
ability to conduct electronic surveillance, detain immigrants without charges
and penetrate money-laundering banks.
http://www.azstarnet.com/star/today/11026NANTITERROR-BILL.html
- House OKs new search powers -Senate
now considers bill intended to stem terrorism
The House approved legislation Wednesday to give police new search
powers in response to last months terrorist attacks, including the ability
to secretly search homes, tap all of a person's telephone conversations and
track people's use of the Internet. http://www.azstarnet.com/star/today/11025nAttacks-TerrorLaws.html
- Big chill on campus free speech
Around the country, college faculty members and staffers who
express opinions on the terrorist attacks and United States and British bombardment
of Afghanistan are facing rebuke in public and private, suspension and investigation.
http://fyi.cnn.com/2001/fyi/teachers.ednews/10/13/academic.chill.ap/index.html
- Terror
probe raises concerns about civil rights
NEW YORK (CNN) -- As the U.S. investigation into the September 11
attacks continues, many civil libertarians said they are concerned about the
possible violation of fundamental U.S. civil rights for those who have been
arrested and detained. http://www.cnn.com/2001/US/10/22/inv.civil.rights/index.html
- NATIONAL ID CARDS -Privacy
vs. Security http://www.azstarnet.com/star/today/11018identity.card-pmb2fjmd.html
U.S. citizens would voluntarily agree to obtain cards. Those without them
would be subject to more rigorous searches at airports. The cards would be
mandatory for foreign visitors, including students on visas and noncitizens
living and working in the United States who now carry "green cards."
- Civil
liberties: expendable or not during war? (02-Oct-01) http://www.cnn.com/2001/fyi/news/10/02/civil.liberties/index.html
As workers sift through the rubble that was the World Trade Center in New
York City just weeks ago, many Americans are asking themselves how many personal
liberties they are willing to sacrifice to prevent more terrorist attacks.
- SolicitorGeneral:
Proposals will not violate rights - http://www.cnn.com/2001/US/09/25/rec.olson.cnna/index.html
- Freedomand
Liberty - http://www.npr.org/ramfiles/me/20010925.me.04.ram
Commentator Patt Morrison says the aftermath of Sept. 11 willtest the strength
of the American people--and of the Constitution.
- Real Audio
InTimes
of Crisis, Law Speaks, but Often With a Forked Tongue
Legal Times September 17, 2001
During war, there's a cacophony of legal noise, sounding all mannerof different
notes. Maybe the noisiest legal reaction comes inthe laws that limit civil
liberties. Noting this, Evan P. Schultzreviews the U.S. Supreme Court's response
-- if even by silence-- to legal challenges to laws made during war time,
and the rationalesoffered in support of upholding seemingly unconstitutional
laws.
- Anti-terrorismproposals
worry civil libertarians http://www.cnn.com/2001/US/09/25/inv.civil.liberties/index.html
- New compromise "Patriot Act"
is still a threat to civil liberties - Congress should reject the
proposed anti-terrorist "Patriot Act" -- which would greatly expand
the federal governments surveillance, wiretapping, and detention authority
-- because no new police powers are needed to effectively fight terrorism,
the Libertarian Party said today.
- Anti-terrorism
bills may come to vote soonhttp://www.cnn.com/2001/US/10/04/inv.antiterrorism.bills/index.html
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The Bush administrations anti-terrorism proposals are
making progress in Congress after being slowed because of concerns from lawmakers
and civil liberties groups that the measures would threaten constitutional
rights.
- Senate
passes anti-terrorism legislation
http://www.cnn.com/2001/ALLPOLITICS/10/12/ret.senate.antiterror/index.html
October 12, 2001
- House passes anti-terrorism law
with changes from Senate version
http://www.azstarnet.com/star/today/11013NAttacks-Congress.html
The House on Friday quickly approved anti-terrorist legislation pushed by
the Senate and White House to increase the governments power to spy on, detain
and punish suspected terrorists.
- No
law prevents Bush from 'taking out' bin Laden
Untold thousands of Americans have been killed by terrorists on American
soil. A veiled enemy has declared war on our nation and our way of life. The
American people look to one person for answers and action: The president of
the United States. What can he do? What should he do?
http://www.cnn.com/2001/LAW/09/columns/fl.dean.war.ce.0930/index.html
- Bush promotes
anti-terrorism bills (25-Sep-01)
http://cnn.com/2001/US/09/25/inv.bush.fbi/index.html
President Bush made a pitch for a new package of anti-terrorism laws Tuesday,
saying the proposed legislation is a "measured" and"constitutional"
response to the September 11 attacks.